Libstar – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

Libstar is a JSE-listed South African food group. Its brands include Lancewood cheese and dairy, Denny mushrooms, Cape Herb & Spice and Dickon Hall sauces and condiments.

How Libstar has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#157largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
364trademarks filed
18different logos published since 2020
18of 45 classes used
1931first trademark filed
234filed in the last 10 years

Libstar trademarks in 45 seconds

Libstar trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/libstar-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

Libstar filed its first South African trademark in 1931 and has filed 364 since; its busiest year was 2018, with 51 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
Libstar4891931–2024

Where Libstar expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. Libstar's portfolio is concentrated in meat, dairy & oils (class 29), coffee, flour & sweets (class 30), cosmetics & cleaning (class 3). Its most recent moves were into paper & print (2019), hand tools (2019), wines & spirits (2018).

Libstar trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Libstar trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/libstar-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
29 Meat, dairy & oils12634.6%1931
30 Coffee, flour & sweets9927.2%1931
3 Cosmetics & cleaning4211.5%1954
31 Fresh produce & pet food277.4%1959
35 Advertising & retail174.7%1999
32 Beer & soft drinks164.4%1966
21 Kitchenware123.3%1962
5 Pharmaceuticals51.4%1982

The brands Libstar protects most

The word marks and logo names Libstar has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1DENNY1331973–2016
2PATLEYS1052000–2000
3AMBASSADOR FOODS842017–2019
4LANCEWOOD842016–2018
5FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS772019–2019
6LIBSTAR FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS772019–2019
7RED MATCHA772018–2018
8RM RED MATCHA772018–2018
9LIBSTAR552015–2015
10PRECIOUS PLANET552019–2021
11FLAVOUR GAMES442021–2021
12GOLD CREST441983–1996
13PRECIOUS PLANET EARTH-LOVING PACKAGING442019–2019
14SNACK'OLOGY442017–2021
15GROSS431997–2020

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

Libstar trademark logo
7 filings · 7 classes
Libstar trademark logo
5 filings · 4 classes
Libstar trademark logo
5 filings · 2 classes
Libstar trademark logo
4 filings · 4 classes
Libstar trademark logo
3 filings · 3 classes
Libstar trademark logo
3 filings · 3 classes
Libstar trademark logo
3 filings · 2 classes
Libstar trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
Libstar trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
Libstar trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes

Libstar's logos

The 18 different logos Libstar has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, Libstar's marks took a median of 2.6 years from filing to registration, faster than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.9 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in Libstar's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Libstar's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Libstar's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, Libstar was #4 of 919 filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), with 36 of 2,013 trademarks; #14 of 1,368 filers in class 30 (coffee, flour & sweets), with 22 of 3,209 trademarks; #1569 of 1,836 filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), with 1 of 3,958 trademarks.

Libstar's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), South Africa 1975–2024: Libstar

Top trademark filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), South Africa 1975–2024: Libstar

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/libstar-south-african-trademarks/class-29-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like Libstar

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Libstar's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

Libstar's closest competitors in South Africa are Clover, Tiger Brands, AVI and RCL Foods.

Libstar trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Libstar trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/libstar-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: Libstar (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1CloverDirect competitor86%
2Tiger BrandsDirect competitor82%
3AVIDirect competitor79%
4RCL FoodsDirect competitor78%
5PepsiCoDirect competitor78%
6Pioneer FoodsDirect competitor76%
7UnileverDirect competitor75%
8ShopriteRetailer's own brands96%
9WoolworthsRetailer's own brands90%
10Pick n PayRetailer's own brands88%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

Libstar – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$8.8 billion of the goods Libstar's main classes cover in the last year – meat; preserved; vegetables; fruit (class 29); coffee; honey; sauces; bread (class 30); cosmetics; essential oils; soaps; lotions (class 3); seeds; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural plants and flowers; malt (class 31); beer; fruit juices; syrups; mineral and aerated waters (class 32). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Libstar's trademarks matter most.

Where South Africa exports Libstar's top goods

Libstar's trademarks most often cover meat, coffee, beer, seeds and cosmetics. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 59% of its exports of them in 2024.

South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones Libstar's specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union83US$2.5 billion+7%NationalUS$2,388
2United Kingdom72US$819 m+9%NationalUS$1,371
3China72US$456 m-6%NationalUS$1,224
4United States of America71US$416 m+4%NationalUS$3,425
5Japan63US$90 m-1%NationalUS$1,774
6Russian Federation62US$261 m+7%NationalUS$1,915
7Hong Kong SAR58US$76 m+1%NationalUS$1,715
8Switzerland58US$55 m+5%NationalUS$1,660
9Philippines57US$54 m+5%NationalUS$1,526
10Nigeria56US$64 m-3%NationalUS$1,015

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Nigeria56US$64 m-3%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
2OAPI (17 states)55US$101 m+5%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z
3Lesotho53US$156 m+0%NationalUS$326
4Algeria53US$3.7 m+45%NationalUS$1,445
5Zimbabwe52US$219 m-0%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
6Eswatini52US$136 m-1%NationalUS$446
7Namibia51US$301 m+6%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
8Botswana51US$354 m-1%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
9Dem. Rep. of the Congo48US$58 m+4%NationalUS$2,100
10Mauritius46US$80 m+9%NationalUS$1,154

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
DENNY3US$609US$1,194
PATLEYS5US$1,015US$1,563
AMBASSADOR FOODS4US$812US$1,378
LANCEWOOD4US$812US$1,378
FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS7US$1,421US$1,932

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For Libstar's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Libstar's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to DENNY (classes 29, 30, 31; searched 2025-04-30 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to PATLEYS (classes 29, 30, 31, 32, 35; searched 2023-11-29 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to AMBASSADOR FOODS (classes 29, 30, 31, 35; searched 2018-06-27 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to LANCEWOOD (classes 29, 30, 31, 32; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similar to FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS (classes 3, 21, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35; searched 2018-02-28 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

Libstar's next five years of renewals

188 of Libstar's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$11,711 over the five years.

Libstar: frequently asked questions

What should Libstar consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Nigeria, OAPI (17 states) and Zimbabwe – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Libstar – relevant export countries”).
  • Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 43 (restaurants & hotels), class 11 (lighting & appliances) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
  • Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 14.6 to 7.4 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which are the top export countries for Libstar's goods?
For the five goods Libstar's trademarks cover most, South Africa's largest export markets in 2024 were Botswana, Mozambique, United Arab Emirates, Namibia and Lesotho. The ten markets in the chart take 59% of these exports, and 65% of that goes to other African countries. The largest of these markets per good: meat (US$402 million): United Arab Emirates, Mozambique, Jordan; coffee (US$43 million): Namibia, Botswana, Mozambique; beer (US$110 million): Zambia, Botswana, Namibia; seeds (US$161 million): Netherlands, Zambia, Namibia; cosmetics (US$327 million): Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe. Exports to Botswana, Namibia and Lesotho move freely within the Southern African Customs Union, but a South African trademark does not protect a brand there – each country needs its own registration (or an ARIPO designation). These are national export figures for the goods, not the company's own sales. Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Which of Libstar's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of Libstar's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: DENNY (first filed 1973, most recently 2016); GROSS (first filed 1997, most recently 2020); CANI (first filed 2013, most recently 2018); LANCEWOOD (first filed 2016, most recently 2018); PATLEYS BRANDED FOOD SOLUTIONS EST.1892 (first filed 2016, most recently 2016). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does Libstar launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, Libstar filed about 7.4 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, fewer than the 14.6 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2016, with 22. Its closest competitors averaged 7.5 new brand names a year over the same period (Clover 8.4, Tiger Brands 11.2, AVI 5.8, RCL Foods 9.4, PepsiCo 2.6). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does Libstar protect each brand?
Libstar has filed 183 different brand names. 60% of them are protected in a single class, while 7 cover five classes or more – the widest is FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS, in 7 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does Libstar usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, Libstar filed most often in October (18% of its filings), November (15%) and June (11%); the busiest quarter was Q4 (43%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
Which classes do Libstar's competitors protect that Libstar does not?
Several of Libstar's closest competitors have filed since 2015 in classes Libstar has never used: class 43 (restaurants & hotels, 3 of its top five competitors); class 11 (lighting & appliances, 2 of its top five competitors); class 25 (clothing, 2 of its top five competitors). These are not necessarily gaps – they may reflect different products – but they are worth reviewing against the goods and services the business actually offers or plans.
How do retailers' own brands compete with Libstar in trademarks?
Retailers' house brands are a growing presence in Libstar's market. In class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), Shoprite, Woolworths and Pick n Pay filed 6% of all trademarks in 2020–2024, compared with 2% in 2005–2014. Retailers are often a brand owner's largest customers and, through their own brands, also its competitors.
Why did some of Libstar's trademarks take more than five years to register?
Of Libstar's trademarks registered in the last two years, 35% had waited more than four years since filing. Almost all of that time is examination: the South African registry has been working through a backlog, so many applications filed in 2020–2022 are only now being accepted. Once a mark is accepted, it is advertised and normally registered within about six months. Prompt responses to the registry's examination reports (office actions) avoid adding further delay.
How long do Libstar's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do Libstar's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can Libstar do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to Libstar's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to Libstar and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.