RFG Foods – South African trademarks
Updated 8 November 2026
RFG Foods (Rhodes Food Group) is a South African food company. Its brands include Rhodes Quality, Bull Brand, Hinds and Pakco, covering canned fruit, vegetables, ready meals and juices.
How RFG Foods has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.
Download report (PDF)RFG Foods trademarks in 45 seconds
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/rfg-foods-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html
A portfolio built over time
RFG Foods filed its first South African trademark in 1931 and has filed 174 since; its busiest year was 2016, with 13 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.
Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.
The names behind the portfolio
Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.
| Name | Marks | Filing years |
|---|---|---|
| Rhodes Food Group | 219 | 1954–2019 |
| RFG Foods | 91 | 1931–2022 |
| New Adventure Investment 30 | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Where RFG Foods expanded its business
Trademark classes show what a business sells. RFG Foods' portfolio is concentrated in meat, dairy & oils (class 29), coffee, flour & sweets (class 30), beer & soft drinks (class 32). Its most recent moves were into restaurants & hotels (2017), education & entertainment (2014), advertising & retail (2003).
RFG Foods trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2022
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/rfg-foods-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html
Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.
| Class | Marks | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Meat, dairy & oils | 64 | 36.8% | 1931 |
| 30 Coffee, flour & sweets | 52 | 29.9% | 1956 |
| 32 Beer & soft drinks | 21 | 12.1% | 1962 |
| 31 Fresh produce & pet food | 11 | 6.3% | 1957 |
| 5 Pharmaceuticals | 9 | 5.2% | 1959 |
| 35 Advertising & retail | 7 | 4.0% | 2003 |
| 42 Tech & IT services | 3 | 1.7% | 1984 |
| 43 Restaurants & hotels | 3 | 1.7% | 2017 |
The brands RFG Foods protects most
The word marks and logo names RFG Foods has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.
| # | Brand | Trademarks | Classes | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RHODES QUALITY | 9 | 5 | 2003–2022 |
| 2 | PAKCO | 8 | 4 | 1992–2019 |
| 3 | HINDS | 7 | 5 | 1959–1973 |
| 4 | PORTOBELLO | 7 | 5 | 2005–2006 |
| 5 | RHODES | 7 | 5 | 1993–2016 |
| 6 | RFF | 6 | 4 | 1978–1993 |
| 7 | DIAMOND BRAND RFF | 6 | 3 | 2001–2001 |
| 8 | RFG | 5 | 5 | 2016–2016 |
| 9 | RHODES FOOD GROUP | 5 | 5 | 2001–2003 |
| 10 | MAGPIE | 5 | 2 | 1992–2011 |
| 11 | RHODES QUALITY SQUISH | 4 | 4 | 2016–2016 |
| 12 | SQUISH | 4 | 4 | 2015–2015 |
| 13 | GANT'S | 4 | 3 | 1989–2017 |
| 14 | TROTTERS | 4 | 3 | 1959–1973 |
| 15 | BULL BRAND | 4 | 2 | 1954–2016 |
Logos filed most often (since 2020)
RFG Foods' logos
The 4 different logos RFG Foods has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.
How quickly its trademarks are registered
Over the last five years, RFG Foods' marks took a median of 6.1 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 5.0 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.
Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.
Who files the most in RFG Foods' classes
Ranked by number of trademarks filed in RFG Foods' main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows RFG Foods' market position, not who is most like it.
In the last five years, RFG Foods was #221 of 919 filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), with 2 of 2,013 trademarks; #301 of 1,368 filers in class 30 (coffee, flour & sweets), with 2 of 3,209 trademarks; #211 of 905 filers in class 32 (beer & soft drinks), with 2 of 1,804 trademarks.
RFG Foods' share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.
Top trademark filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), South Africa 1975–2024: RFG Foods
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/rfg-foods-south-african-trademarks/class-29-race-video.html
Main competitors – the companies most like RFG Foods
Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to RFG Foods' – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.
RFG Foods' closest competitors in South Africa are Tiger Brands, Libstar, Nestlé and AVI.
RFG Foods trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/rfg-foods-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html
Trademark filings per year: RFG Foods (orange) and its five closest competitors.
| # | Company | Relationship | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tiger Brands | Direct competitor | 78% |
| 2 | Libstar | Direct competitor | 76% |
| 3 | Nestlé | Direct competitor | 74% |
| 4 | AVI | Direct competitor | 74% |
| 5 | Clover | Direct competitor | 72% |
| 6 | Danone | Direct competitor | 72% |
| 7 | Pioneer Foods | Direct competitor | 72% |
| 8 | PepsiCo | Direct competitor | 71% |
| 9 | Nando's | 73% | |
| 10 | Pick n Pay | Retailer's own brands | 99% |
Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.
RFG Foods – relevant export countries
South Africa exported US$9.1 billion of the goods RFG Foods' main classes cover in the last year – meat; fish; jams; eggs (class 29); coffee; bread; spices; honey (class 30); beer; fruit juices; syrups; mineral and aerated waters (class 32); seeds; fresh fruits and vegetables; natural plants and flowers; malt (class 31); dietary supplements; adapted; dietetic substances; pharmaceuticals (class 5). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where RFG Foods' trademarks matter most.
Where South Africa exports RFG Foods' top goods
RFG Foods' trademarks most often cover coffee, meat, beer, dietary supplements and seeds. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 61% of its exports of them in 2024.
South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones RFG Foods' specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.
Adjust the weightings
These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.
Worldwide
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Union | 82 | US$2.6 billion | +4% | National | US$2,388 |
| 2 | China | 72 | US$467 m | -1% | National | US$1,224 |
| 3 | United Kingdom | 71 | US$792 m | +2% | National | US$1,371 |
| 4 | United States of America | 70 | US$432 m | +3% | National | US$3,425 |
| 5 | Japan | 62 | US$74 m | -7% | National | US$1,774 |
| 6 | Canada | 60 | US$200 m | -1% | National | US$2,192 |
| 7 | Russian Federation | 60 | US$256 m | +0% | National | US$1,915 |
| 8 | Hong Kong SAR | 56 | US$88 m | +1% | National | US$1,715 |
| 9 | Philippines | 56 | US$53 m | +4% | National | US$1,526 |
| 10 | Nigeria | 55 | US$70 m | -12% | National | US$1,015 |
Africa
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nigeria | 55 | US$70 m | -12% | National | US$1,015 S&Z |
| 2 | OAPI (17 states) | 54 | US$116 m | +3% | National | US$1,563 S&Z |
| 3 | Mozambique | 52 | US$317 m | +3% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 4 | Lesotho | 52 | US$164 m | +2% | National | US$326 |
| 5 | Malawi | 51 | US$36 m | -2% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 6 | Algeria | 51 | US$4.6 m | +25% | National | US$1,445 |
| 7 | Zimbabwe | 51 | US$205 m | +6% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 8 | Egypt | 51 | US$16 m | -1% | National | US$2,278 |
| 9 | Eswatini | 50 | US$159 m | -4% | National | US$446 |
| 10 | Botswana | 49 | US$371 m | -3% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.
Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z
| Brand | Classes | Nigeria | OAPI (17 states) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHODES QUALITY | 5 | US$1,015 | US$1,563 |
| PAKCO | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| HINDS | 5 | US$1,015 | US$1,563 |
| PORTOBELLO | 5 | US$1,015 | US$1,563 |
| RHODES | 5 | US$1,015 | US$1,563 |
S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.
TM Country Selection Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.
Word marks you may have considered opposing
For RFG Foods' five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not RFG Foods' own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.
Similar to RHODES QUALITY (classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to PAKCO (classes 29, 30, 31, 42; searched 2025-11-26 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to HINDS (classes 1, 5, 29, 30, 32; searched 2019-04-24 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to PORTOBELLO (classes 29, 30, 31, 32, 35; searched 2020-05-27 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to RHODES (classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.
How S&Z can help you
S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.
We manage your trademarks – not just file them
Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:
Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices
S&Z prices – South African trademarks
| Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificate | US$240 |
| Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same time | US$225 |
| Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing) | R1,027 ≈ US$62.29 |
Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.
RFG Foods' next five years of renewals
50 of RFG Foods' registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$3,115 over the five years.
RFG Foods: frequently asked questions
What should RFG Foods consider for its trademarks?
- Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Nigeria, OAPI (17 states) and Mozambique – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “RFG Foods – relevant export countries”).
- Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), class 21 (kitchenware) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
- Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 1.8 to 0.4 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
- Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.