Pepkor – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

Pepkor is a JSE-listed discount and value retailer. Its chains include PEP, Ackermans, Tekkie Town and furniture and appliance stores.

How Pepkor has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#68largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
802trademarks filed
36different logos published since 2020
36of 45 classes used
1919first trademark filed
293filed in the last 10 years

Pepkor trademarks in 45 seconds

Pepkor trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/pepkor-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

Pepkor filed its first South African trademark in 1919 and has filed 802 since; its busiest year was 2020, with 86 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
Pepkor1,2251919–2025
Pepkor Retail751975–2008
Rapitrade 14162015–2019
Pepkor Trading Propreitary12024–2024

Where Pepkor expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. Pepkor's portfolio is concentrated in clothing (class 25), advertising & retail (class 35), textiles (class 24). Its most recent moves were into machines (2023), paints (2017), tobacco (2017).

Pepkor trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2025

Pepkor trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2025

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/pepkor-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
25 Clothing20625.7%1941
35 Advertising & retail10613.2%1974
24 Textiles8110.1%1919
9 Electronics & software506.2%1952
36 Finance & insurance334.1%1974
3 Cosmetics & cleaning313.9%1982
18 Leather & bags293.6%1981
42 Tech & IT services293.6%1974

The brands Pepkor protects most

The word marks and logo names Pepkor has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1PEP59151973–2020
2DEALZ26242017–2017
3PEPKOR19191982–1982
4ACKERMANS BABY COMPANY17121999–2021
5WAVERLEY1451919–1980
6CUDDLESOME13111973–2020
7ACKERMANS1361979–2012
8BUDDY BEAR12122006–2012
9PEP HOME1242010–2020
10MI CHA992021–2021
11CUBE952005–2023
12HIFI CORP EXPRESS842017–2017
13AYANA772013–2024
14JD GROUP772022–2022
15HOME COMFORTS662002–2002

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

Pepkor trademark logo
22 filings · 9 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
11 filings · 6 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
9 filings · 9 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
9 filings · 4 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
8 filings · 4 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
6 filings · 6 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
6 filings · 3 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
5 filings · 4 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
4 filings · 4 classes
Pepkor trademark logo
4 filings · 4 classes

Pepkor's logos

The 36 different logos Pepkor has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, Pepkor's marks took a median of 3.0 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.9 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in Pepkor's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Pepkor's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Pepkor's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, Pepkor was #3 of 2,715 filers in class 25 (clothing), with 35 of 4,647 trademarks; #17 of 5,866 filers in class 35 (advertising & retail), with 27 of 11,124 trademarks; #14 of 369 filers in class 24 (textiles), with 6 of 679 trademarks.

Pepkor's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 25 (clothing), South Africa 1975–2024: Pepkor

Top trademark filers in class 25 (clothing), South Africa 1975–2024: Pepkor

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/pepkor-south-african-trademarks/class-25-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like Pepkor

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Pepkor's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

Pepkor's closest competitors in South Africa are TFG, Woolworths, Retailability and Fast Retailing.

Pepkor trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Pepkor trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/pepkor-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: Pepkor (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1TFGDirect competitor85%
2WoolworthsDirect competitor69%
3RetailabilityDirect competitor69%
4Fast RetailingDirect competitor67%
5Mr PriceDirect competitor65%
6EdconDirect competitor64%
7Stellenbosch UniversitySupplier / brand owner67%
8Universal City StudiosSupplier / brand owner64%
9FerrariSupplier / brand owner63%
10ShopriteOther field71%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

Pepkor – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$1.9 billion of the goods Pepkor's main classes cover in the last year – clothing; footwear; headwear; headgear (class 25); blankets; curtains; linen; textiles (class 24); computer software; computers; cases; apparatus and instruments (class 9); cosmetics; essential oils; perfumery; lotions (class 3); bags; backpacks; umbrellas; purses (class 18). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Pepkor's trademarks matter most.

Where South Africa exports Pepkor's top goods

Pepkor's trademarks most often cover clothing, cosmetics, bags and blankets. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 74% of its exports of them in 2024.

South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones Pepkor's specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union77US$158 m-0%NationalUS$2,388
2United States of America74US$100 m-3%NationalUS$3,425
3United Kingdom69US$39 m-4%NationalUS$1,371
4Japan64US$12 m-1%NationalUS$1,774
5Namibia63US$289 m+8%ARIPOUS$450
6Botswana61US$282 m-4%ARIPOUS$450
7Canada61US$9.2 m-6%NationalUS$2,192
8Australia60US$23 m-3%NationalUS$2,380
9Switzerland60US$4.8 m-2%NationalUS$1,660
10Hong Kong SAR59US$3.6 m+8%NationalUS$1,715

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Namibia63US$289 m+8%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
2Botswana61US$282 m-4%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
3Nigeria55US$14 m-10%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
4Zimbabwe55US$97 m+2%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
5OAPI (17 states)54US$22 m+2%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z
6Tanzania53US$22 m+1%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
7Malawi52US$20 m+22%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
8Mozambique52US$88 m-16%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
9Uganda50US$7.7 m+12%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
10Egypt49US$734 k-4%NationalUS$2,278

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
PEP15US$3,045US$3,410
DEALZ24US$4,872US$5,072
PEPKOR19US$3,857US$4,149
ACKERMANS BABY COMPANY12US$2,436US$2,856
WAVERLEY5US$1,015US$1,563

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For Pepkor's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Pepkor's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to PEP (classes 9, 24, 25, 35, 36; searched 2018-05-30 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to DEALZ (classes 24, 25, 35, 36; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)

MarkPublishedClassApplicant
THE REAL DEALZ2023-03-2935SMD Technologies

Similar to PEPKOR (classes 24, 25, 35, 36; searched 2018-07-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to ACKERMANS BABY COMPANY (classes 24, 25, 35; searched 2018-05-30 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to WAVERLEY (classes 10, 23, 24, 25, 27; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

Pepkor's next five years of renewals

294 of Pepkor's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$18,312 over the five years.

Pepkor: frequently asked questions

What should Pepkor consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Botswana and Nigeria – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Pepkor – relevant export countries”).
  • Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 45 (legal & security) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
  • Similar marks: we found 1 word mark of other companies that we consider confusingly similar to its top brands (see “Word marks you may have considered opposing”) – a watch service flags new ones while they can still be opposed.
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which are the top export countries for Pepkor's goods?
For the five goods Pepkor's trademarks cover most, South Africa's largest export markets in 2024 were Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho and United States. The ten markets in the chart take 74% of these exports, and 86% of that goes to other African countries. The largest of these markets per good: clothing (US$411 million): Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini; cosmetics (US$327 million): Botswana, Namibia, United States; bags (US$43 million): Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini; blankets (US$11 million): Lesotho, Namibia, Botswana. Exports to Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini and Lesotho move freely within the Southern African Customs Union, but a South African trademark does not protect a brand there – each country needs its own registration (or an ARIPO designation). These are national export figures for the goods, not the company's own sales. Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Which of Pepkor's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of Pepkor's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: PEP (first filed 1973, most recently 2020); CUDDLESOME (first filed 1973, most recently 2020); TANGO (first filed 1991, most recently 2019); ACKERMANS BABY COMPANY (first filed 1999, most recently 2021); CUBE (first filed 2005, most recently 2023). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does Pepkor launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, Pepkor filed about 9.8 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, more than the 8.6 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2020, with 17. Its closest competitors averaged 7.6 new brand names a year over the same period (TFG 8.8, Woolworths 22.2, Retailability 2.8, Fast Retailing 2.4, Mr Price 2.0). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does Pepkor protect each brand?
Pepkor has filed 298 different brand names. 60% of them are protected in a single class, while 21 cover five classes or more – the widest is DEALZ, in 24 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does Pepkor usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, Pepkor filed most often in May (22% of its filings), September (14%) and October (11%); the busiest quarter was Q2 (36%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
Which classes do Pepkor's competitors protect that Pepkor does not?
Several of Pepkor's closest competitors have filed since 2015 in classes Pepkor has never used: class 45 (legal & security, 4 of its top five competitors). These are not necessarily gaps – they may reflect different products – but they are worth reviewing against the goods and services the business actually offers or plans.
Why did some of Pepkor's trademarks take more than five years to register?
Of Pepkor's trademarks registered in the last two years, 26% had waited more than four years since filing. Almost all of that time is examination: the South African registry has been working through a backlog, so many applications filed in 2020–2022 are only now being accepted. Once a mark is accepted, it is advertised and normally registered within about six months. Prompt responses to the registry's examination reports (office actions) avoid adding further delay.
How long do Pepkor's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do Pepkor's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can Pepkor do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to Pepkor's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to Pepkor and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.