dsm-firmenich – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

dsm-firmenich is a Swiss-Dutch science company. It makes ingredients for nutrition, health and beauty – including vitamins, flavours, fragrances and animal feed additives.

How dsm-firmenich has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#155largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
369trademarks filed
8different logos published since 2020
23of 45 classes used
1952first trademark filed
80filed in the last 10 years

dsm-firmenich trademarks in 45 seconds

dsm-firmenich trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/dsm-firmenich-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

dsm-firmenich filed its first South African trademark in 1952 and has filed 369 since; its busiest year was 2006, with 32 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
dsm-firmenich4071952–2024
Dsm Assets72006–2010

Where dsm-firmenich expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. dsm-firmenich's portfolio is concentrated in chemicals (class 1), pharmaceuticals (class 5), coffee, flour & sweets (class 30). Its most recent moves were into machines (2021), medical & beauty care (2021), legal & security (2021).

dsm-firmenich trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

dsm-firmenich trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/dsm-firmenich-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
1 Chemicals10227.6%1952
5 Pharmaceuticals7019.0%1952
30 Coffee, flour & sweets3710.0%1970
29 Meat, dairy & oils277.3%1974
31 Fresh produce & pet food277.3%1952
32 Beer & soft drinks226.0%2004
17 Rubber & plastics143.8%1952
3 Cosmetics & cleaning133.5%1995

The brands dsm-firmenich protects most

The word marks and logo names dsm-firmenich has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1DSM14121970–2010
2SUSTELL1262021–2021
3DYNEEMA881985–2020
4FATS OF LIFE882006–2006
5TOLERASE651999–2012
6DELVO552018–2018
7I-FLEX552007–2007
8I-FLEX ...I CAN FLEX FREELY552008–2008
9LIFE'S552015–2015
10MAITAO552007–2007
11RESVIDA552006–2006
12FABULESS542006–2006
13ALLQVIDA442009–2009
14B.E.N.442022–2022
15ELVIVIA442007–2007

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

dsm-firmenich trademark logo
13 filings · 2 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
6 filings · 6 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
4 filings · 4 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
4 filings · 2 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
dsm-firmenich trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class

dsm-firmenich's logos

The 8 different logos dsm-firmenich has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, dsm-firmenich's marks took a median of 3.2 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 2.5 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in dsm-firmenich's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in dsm-firmenich's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows dsm-firmenich's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, dsm-firmenich was #16 of 947 filers in class 1 (chemicals), with 13 of 2,054 trademarks; #49 of 2,050 filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), with 16 of 6,111 trademarks.

dsm-firmenich's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 1 (chemicals), South Africa 1975–2024: dsm-firmenich

Top trademark filers in class 1 (chemicals), South Africa 1975–2024: dsm-firmenich

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/dsm-firmenich-south-african-trademarks/class-1-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like dsm-firmenich

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to dsm-firmenich's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

dsm-firmenich's closest competitors in South Africa are Sumitomo Chemical, Innovative Water Care, Omnia and BASF.

dsm-firmenich trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

dsm-firmenich trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/dsm-firmenich-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: dsm-firmenich (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1Sumitomo ChemicalDirect competitor81%
2Innovative Water CareDirect competitor78%
3OmniaDirect competitor72%
4BASFDirect competitor68%
5EvonikDirect competitor67%
6AECIDirect competitor64%
7MerckDirect competitor64%
8N LaboratoriesRelated field75%
9BayerRelated field72%
10UPLRelated field68%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

dsm-firmenich – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$2.3 billion of the goods dsm-firmenich's main classes cover in the last year – raw materials; vitamins; pharmaceuticals; herb extracts (class 1); dietary supplements; vitamins; vitamin preparations; pharmaceuticals (class 5); bread; cookies; pastries; spices (class 30); meat; jams; cheese; eggs (class 29); foodstuffs; animals; animal feed; fodder (class 31). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where dsm-firmenich's trademarks matter most.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union79US$200 m+2%NationalUS$2,388
2United States of America72US$87 m+0%NationalUS$3,425
3China71US$30 m-8%NationalUS$1,224
4United Kingdom69US$45 m+0%NationalUS$1,371
5Namibia65US$248 m+8%ARIPOUS$450
6Zimbabwe63US$197 m+12%ARIPOUS$450
7Japan62US$8.2 m-6%NationalUS$1,774
8Botswana62US$213 m+1%ARIPOUS$450
9Mozambique62US$175 m+6%ARIPOUS$450
10Türkiye60US$16 m+15%NationalUS$1,258

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Namibia65US$248 m+8%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
2Zimbabwe63US$197 m+12%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
3Botswana62US$213 m+1%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
4Mozambique62US$175 m+6%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
5Lesotho57US$99 m-6%NationalUS$326
6Nigeria57US$30 m-10%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
7Malawi57US$32 m+13%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
8Eswatini56US$86 m-6%NationalUS$446
9Egypt54US$13 m-1%NationalUS$2,278
10OAPI (17 states)54US$19 m+3%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
DSM12US$2,436US$2,856
SUSTELL6US$1,218US$1,748
DYNEEMA8US$1,624US$2,117
FATS OF LIFE8US$1,624US$2,117
TOLERASE5US$1,015US$1,563

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For dsm-firmenich's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not dsm-firmenich's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to DSM (classes 1, 5, 29, 30, 31; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to SUSTELL (classes 9, 38, 41, 42, 44, 45; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similar to DYNEEMA (classes 9, 10, 12, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24; searched 2018-04-25 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to FATS OF LIFE (classes 1, 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 41; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-08)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to TOLERASE (classes 1, 5, 29, 30, 32; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

dsm-firmenich's next five years of renewals

107 of dsm-firmenich's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$6,666 over the five years.

dsm-firmenich: frequently asked questions

What should dsm-firmenich consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Zimbabwe and Botswana – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “dsm-firmenich – relevant export countries”).
  • Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 40 (processing materials), class 4 (oils & fuels) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which of dsm-firmenich's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of dsm-firmenich's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: DYNEEMA (first filed 1985, most recently 2020); MODUMAX (first filed 2016, most recently 2016); DELVO (first filed 2018, most recently 2018); ampli-D (first filed 2021, most recently 2023); CONSONENZ (first filed 2021, most recently 2021). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does dsm-firmenich launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, dsm-firmenich filed about 4.6 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, more than the 1.8 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2023, with 10. Its closest competitors averaged 3.4 new brand names a year over the same period (Sumitomo Chemical 0.8, Innovative Water Care 0.4, Omnia 2.6, BASF 8.0, Evonik 5.0). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does dsm-firmenich protect each brand?
dsm-firmenich has filed 160 different brand names. 46% of them are protected in a single class, while 11 cover five classes or more – the widest is DSM, in 12 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does dsm-firmenich usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, dsm-firmenich filed most often in January (18% of its filings), September (17%) and June (14%); the busiest quarter was Q1 (33%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
Which classes do dsm-firmenich's competitors protect that dsm-firmenich does not?
Several of dsm-firmenich's closest competitors have filed since 2015 in classes dsm-firmenich has never used: class 40 (processing materials, 4 of its top five competitors); class 4 (oils & fuels, 3 of its top five competitors); class 6 (metal goods, 3 of its top five competitors); class 37 (construction & repair, 2 of its top five competitors). These are not necessarily gaps – they may reflect different products – but they are worth reviewing against the goods and services the business actually offers or plans.
Why did some of dsm-firmenich's trademarks take more than five years to register?
Of dsm-firmenich's trademarks registered in the last two years, 24% had waited more than four years since filing. Almost all of that time is examination: the South African registry has been working through a backlog, so many applications filed in 2020–2022 are only now being accepted. Once a mark is accepted, it is advertised and normally registered within about six months. Prompt responses to the registry's examination reports (office actions) avoid adding further delay.
How long do dsm-firmenich's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do dsm-firmenich's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can dsm-firmenich do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to dsm-firmenich's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to dsm-firmenich and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.