Spur – South African trademarks
Updated 8 November 2026
Spur Corporation is a JSE-listed South African restaurant group. Its brands include Spur Steak Ranches, Panarottis, John Dory's, RocoMamas and Doppio Zero.
How Spur has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.
Download report (PDF)Spur trademarks in 45 seconds
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/spur-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html
A portfolio built over time
Spur filed its first South African trademark in 1963 and has filed 306 since; its busiest year was 2020, with 27 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.
Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.
The names behind the portfolio
Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.
| Name | Marks | Filing years |
|---|---|---|
| Spur | 366 | 1963–2024 |
Where Spur expanded its business
Trademark classes show what a business sells. Spur's portfolio is concentrated in restaurants & hotels (class 43), coffee, flour & sweets (class 30), meat, dairy & oils (class 29). Its most recent moves were into electronics & software (2022), furniture (2008), education & entertainment (2000).
Spur trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/spur-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html
Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.
| Class | Marks | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 Restaurants & hotels | 107 | 35.0% | 1977 |
| 30 Coffee, flour & sweets | 90 | 29.4% | 1963 |
| 29 Meat, dairy & oils | 80 | 26.1% | 1963 |
| 42 Tech & IT services | 7 | 2.3% | 1988 |
| 41 Education & entertainment | 6 | 2.0% | 2000 |
| 9 Electronics & software | 5 | 1.6% | 2022 |
| 28 Toys & sports goods | 3 | 1.0% | 1988 |
| 20 Furniture | 2 | 0.7% | 2008 |
The brands Spur protects most
The word marks and logo names Spur has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.
| # | Brand | Trademarks | Classes | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPUR | 13 | 7 | 1977–2022 |
| 2 | CASA BELLA | 8 | 4 | 2015–2022 |
| 3 | John Dory's | 8 | 4 | 2017–2024 |
| 4 | PANAROTTIS | 7 | 4 | 2020–2022 |
| 5 | GRILL & GO | 6 | 3 | 2015–2015 |
| 6 | PANAROTTI'S EXPRESS | 6 | 3 | 2000–2000 |
| 7 | REEL SUSHI | 6 | 3 | 2020–2020 |
| 8 | TEX-MEX | 6 | 3 | 1992–1992 |
| 9 | THE GOODIE BOX | 6 | 3 | 2020–2020 |
| 10 | DOUGH IT YOURSELF | 4 | 4 | 2008–2008 |
| 11 | GET THAT GREAT TASTE/GENIET DAARDIE SMULLEKKER SMAAK | 4 | 4 | 1995–1995 |
| 12 | SALAD VALLEY | 4 | 4 | 1986–1986 |
| 13 | SPUR SECRET TRIBE | 4 | 4 | 2000–2000 |
| 14 | THE HUSSAR GRILL | 4 | 4 | 2014–2022 |
| 15 | PIZZA PUG | 4 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Logos filed most often (since 2020)
Spur's logos
The 10 different logos Spur has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.
How quickly its trademarks are registered
Over the last five years, Spur's marks took a median of 2.3 years from filing to registration, faster than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.2 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance. In 2026 the median jumped to 5.9 years: older applications – many filed years earlier – were finally accepted and registered, as the registry worked through its examination backlog.
Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.
Who files the most in Spur's classes
Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Spur's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Spur's market position, not who is most like it.
In the last five years, Spur was #2 of 1,259 filers in class 43 (restaurants & hotels), with 27 of 2,216 trademarks; #22 of 1,368 filers in class 30 (coffee, flour & sweets), with 15 of 3,209 trademarks; #14 of 919 filers in class 29 (meat, dairy & oils), with 14 of 2,013 trademarks.
Spur's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.
Top trademark filers in class 43 (restaurants & hotels), South Africa 1975–2024: Spur
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/spur-south-african-trademarks/class-43-race-video.html
Main competitors – the companies most like Spur
Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Spur's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.
Spur's closest competitors in South Africa are KFC, Wimpy (Pleasure Foods), Athanasios Cavallineas A South African … and Triplesevens Trust.
Spur trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/spur-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html
Trademark filings per year: Spur (orange) and its five closest competitors.
| # | Company | Relationship | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KFC | Direct competitor | 78% |
| 2 | Wimpy (Pleasure Foods) | Direct competitor | 78% |
| 3 | Athanasios Cavallineas A South African … | Direct competitor | 76% |
| 4 | Triplesevens Trust | Direct competitor | 74% |
| 5 | Nando's | Direct competitor | 72% |
| 6 | Gastronomie Investment | Direct competitor | 68% |
| 7 | Shoprite | Retailer's own brands | 82% |
| 8 | Ajpg Investments | Retailer's own brands | 70% |
| 9 | Woolworths | Retailer's own brands | 67% |
| 10 | Food Lovers | Retailer's own brands | 66% |
Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.
Spur – relevant export countries
Adjust the weightings
These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.
Worldwide
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Union | 83 | US$535 m | -0% | National | US$2,388 |
| 2 | United States of America | 76 | US$251 m | +1% | National | US$3,425 |
| 3 | United Kingdom | 68 | US$78 m | -2% | National | US$1,371 |
| 4 | India | 64 | US$26 m | +9% | National | US$1,295 |
| 5 | Japan | 63 | US$14 m | -5% | National | US$1,774 |
| 6 | Canada | 62 | US$37 m | -3% | National | US$2,192 |
| 7 | Hong Kong SAR | 62 | US$36 m | -0% | National | US$1,715 |
| 8 | Australia | 62 | US$87 m | -1% | National | US$2,380 |
| 9 | Türkiye | 60 | US$6.5 m | +11% | National | US$1,258 |
| 10 | Botswana | 59 | US$419 m | -4% | ARIPO | US$450 |
Africa
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Botswana | 59 | US$419 m | -4% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 2 | Lesotho | 56 | US$183 m | +6% | National | US$326 |
| 3 | Zimbabwe | 56 | US$233 m | +14% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 4 | Mozambique | 55 | US$260 m | +2% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 5 | Nigeria | 55 | US$45 m | -10% | National | US$1,015 S&Z |
| 6 | OAPI (17 states) | 54 | US$60 m | +8% | National | US$1,563 S&Z |
| 7 | Eswatini | 54 | US$158 m | +3% | National | US$446 |
| 8 | Tanzania | 53 | US$41 m | +7% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 9 | Malawi | 52 | US$47 m | +20% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 10 | Egypt | 52 | US$17 m | -4% | National | US$2,278 |
SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.
Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z
| Brand | Classes | Nigeria | OAPI (17 states) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPUR | 7 | US$1,421 | US$1,932 |
| CASA BELLA | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| John Dory's | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| PANAROTTIS | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| GRILL & GO | 3 | US$609 | US$1,194 |
S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.
TM Country Selection Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.
Word marks you may have considered opposing
For Spur's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Spur's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.
Similar to SPUR (classes 3, 9, 18, 28, 29, 30, 43; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to CASA BELLA (classes 9, 29, 30, 43; searched 2018-02-28 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to John Dory's (classes 9, 29, 30, 43; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to PANAROTTIS (classes 9, 29, 30, 43; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to GRILL & GO (classes 29, 30, 43; searched 2018-02-28 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.
How S&Z can help you
S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.
We manage your trademarks – not just file them
Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:
Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices
S&Z prices – South African trademarks
| Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificate | US$240 |
| Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same time | US$225 |
| Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing) | R1,027 ≈ US$62.29 |
Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.
Spur's next five years of renewals
126 of Spur's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$7,849 over the five years.
Spur: frequently asked questions
What should Spur consider for its trademarks?
- Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 38 (telecoms), class 39 (transport & travel) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
- Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.