SC Johnson – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

SC Johnson is a family-owned American maker of household products. Its brands include Mr Muscle, Raid, Baygon, Glade, Mr Min and Ziploc.

How SC Johnson has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#110largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
519trademarks filed
4different logos published since 2020
19of 45 classes used
1919first trademark filed
149filed in the last 10 years

SC Johnson trademarks in 45 seconds

SC Johnson trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/sc-johnson-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

SC Johnson filed its first South African trademark in 1919 and has filed 519 since; its busiest year was 2018, with 43 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
SC Johnson4921919–2024
Scjohnson and Son191954–2007
S C Johnson and Son151984–2010
Sc Johnson Home Storage151999–2001
Sc Jonhson and Son31997–1997

Where SC Johnson expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. SC Johnson's portfolio is concentrated in cosmetics & cleaning (class 3), pharmaceuticals (class 5), kitchenware (class 21). Its most recent moves were into hand tools (2018), clothing (2013), construction & repair (2003).

SC Johnson trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

SC Johnson trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/sc-johnson-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
3 Cosmetics & cleaning17633.9%1919
5 Pharmaceuticals16331.4%1947
21 Kitchenware397.5%1970
4 Oils & fuels305.8%1979
16 Paper & print214.0%1992
11 Lighting & appliances183.5%1989
2 Paints183.5%1966
1 Chemicals152.9%1955

The brands SC Johnson protects most

The word marks and logo names SC Johnson has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY22111999–2020
2KIWI2061919–2019
3SC JOHNSON12101998–2018
4MR MUSCLE1131975–2017
5SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY AT WORK FOR A BETTER WORLD10102018–2018
6OFF!1031994–2016
7PLEDGE951961–2018
8RAID951955–2010
9GLADE941963–2014
10JOHNSON761964–1989
11SC JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL761990–2020
12INNOCHEM661979–1979
13KIWI POLISH JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY662017–2017
14SC JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL A FAMILY COMPANY662018–2018
15SCJOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY662007–2007

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

SC Johnson trademark logo
20 filings · 10 classes
SC Johnson trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
SC Johnson trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
SC Johnson trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes

SC Johnson's logos

The 4 different logos SC Johnson has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, SC Johnson's marks took a median of 2.7 years from filing to registration, faster than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.9 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in SC Johnson's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in SC Johnson's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows SC Johnson's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, SC Johnson was #25 of 1,836 filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), with 15 of 3,958 trademarks; #74 of 2,050 filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), with 12 of 6,111 trademarks; #43 of 817 filers in class 21 (kitchenware), with 4 of 1,364 trademarks.

SC Johnson's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), South Africa 1975–2024: SC Johnson

Top trademark filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), South Africa 1975–2024: SC Johnson

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/sc-johnson-south-african-trademarks/class-3-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like SC Johnson

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to SC Johnson's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

SC Johnson's closest competitors in South Africa are Amka, Colgate-Palmolive, Reckitt and Kimberly-Clark.

SC Johnson trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

SC Johnson trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/sc-johnson-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: SC Johnson (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1AmkaDirect competitor74%
2Colgate-PalmoliveDirect competitor68%
3ReckittDirect competitor67%
4Kimberly-ClarkDirect competitor64%
5Procter & GambleDirect competitor63%
6Lion Match CompanyDirect competitor61%
7Johnson & JohnsonRelated field73%
8L'OrealRelated field72%
9KenvueRelated field69%
10NativaRelated field67%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

SC Johnson – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$1.9 billion of the goods SC Johnson's main classes cover in the last year – essential oils; perfumes; air fragrancing preparations; perfuming preparations (class 3); deodorants; air purifying preparations; deodorizers; insect repellents (class 5); brushes; containers; cleaning; shoe trees (class 21); candles; wax melts (class 4); plastic bags; adhesives; canvas; plastics (class 16). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where SC Johnson's trademarks matter most.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union75US$181 m-0%NationalUS$2,388
2United States of America73US$92 m-1%NationalUS$3,425
3United Kingdom61US$26 m-4%NationalUS$1,371
4Japan57US$8.1 m-4%NationalUS$1,774
5Australia57US$41 m-6%NationalUS$2,380
6Switzerland55US$3.7 m+18%NationalUS$1,660
7Canada55US$2.2 m-3%NationalUS$2,192
8Mexico54US$9.7 m+7%NationalUS$3,050
9Namibia53US$273 m+7%ARIPOUS$450
10China53US$23 m-1%NationalUS$1,224

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Namibia53US$273 m+7%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
2Zimbabwe50US$173 m+11%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
3OAPI (17 states)48US$14 m+5%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z
4Botswana48US$207 m-3%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
5Nigeria48US$9.9 m-10%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
6Mozambique47US$129 m+3%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
7Egypt46US$4.0 m-0%NationalUS$2,278
8Morocco45US$1.5 m+12%NationalUS$1,408
9Malawi45US$47 m+21%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
10Eswatini45US$123 m-1%NationalUS$446

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY11US$2,233US$2,671
KIWI6US$1,218US$1,748
SC JOHNSON10US$2,030US$2,487
MR MUSCLE3US$609US$1,194
SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY AT WORK FOR A BETTER WORLD10US$2,030US$2,487

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For SC Johnson's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not SC Johnson's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY (classes 3, 4, 5, 16, 21; searched 2018-07-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to KIWI (classes 1, 2, 3, 5, 21, 26; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similar to SC JOHNSON (classes 3, 4, 5, 16, 21; searched 2018-07-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to MR MUSCLE (classes 3, 5, 21; searched 2018-04-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY AT WORK FOR A BETTER WORLD (classes 3, 4, 5, 16, 21; searched 2018-07-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

SC Johnson's next five years of renewals

234 of SC Johnson's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$14,575 over the five years.

SC Johnson: frequently asked questions

What should SC Johnson consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Zimbabwe and OAPI (17 states) – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “SC Johnson – relevant export countries”).
  • Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 10 (medical devices), class 30 (coffee, flour & sweets) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
  • Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 3.8 to 2.8 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which of SC Johnson's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of SC Johnson's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: KIWI (first filed 1919, most recently 2019); PLEDGE (first filed 1961, most recently 2018); MR MUSCLE (first filed 1975, most recently 2017); SC JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL (first filed 1990, most recently 2020); OFF! (first filed 1994, most recently 2016). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does SC Johnson launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, SC Johnson filed about 2.8 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, fewer than the 3.8 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2018, with 8. Its closest competitors averaged 6.6 new brand names a year over the same period (Amka 15.4, Colgate-Palmolive 4.8, Reckitt 3.0, Kimberly-Clark 1.8, Procter & Gamble 8.2). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does SC Johnson protect each brand?
SC Johnson has filed 259 different brand names. 67% of them are protected in a single class, while 14 cover five classes or more – the widest is SC JOHNSON A FAMILY COMPANY, in 11 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does SC Johnson usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, SC Johnson filed most often in February (24% of its filings), June (23%) and May (16%); the busiest quarter was Q2 (42%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
Which classes do SC Johnson's competitors protect that SC Johnson does not?
Several of SC Johnson's closest competitors have filed since 2015 in classes SC Johnson has never used: class 10 (medical devices, 4 of its top five competitors); class 30 (coffee, flour & sweets, 2 of its top five competitors); class 44 (medical & beauty care, 2 of its top five competitors); class 32 (beer & soft drinks, 2 of its top five competitors). These are not necessarily gaps – they may reflect different products – but they are worth reviewing against the goods and services the business actually offers or plans.
How do retailers' own brands compete with SC Johnson in trademarks?
Retailers' house brands are a growing presence in SC Johnson's market. In class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), Clicks and Dis-Chem filed 1% of all trademarks in 2020–2024, compared with 0% in 2005–2014. Retailers are often a brand owner's largest customers and, through their own brands, also its competitors.
How long do SC Johnson's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do SC Johnson's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can SC Johnson do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to SC Johnson's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to SC Johnson and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.