Eli Lilly – South African trademarks
Updated 8 November 2026
Eli Lilly is an American pharmaceutical company, with medicines for diabetes, obesity, cancer, immunology and neuroscience.
How Eli Lilly has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.
Download report (PDF)Eli Lilly trademarks in 45 seconds
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/eli-lilly-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html
A portfolio built over time
Eli Lilly filed its first South African trademark in 1942 and has filed 216 since; its busiest year was 2020, with 20 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.
Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.
The names behind the portfolio
Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.
| Name | Marks | Filing years |
|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly | 240 | 1942–2024 |
Where Eli Lilly expanded its business
Trademark classes show what a business sells. Eli Lilly's portfolio is concentrated in pharmaceuticals (class 5), medical devices (class 10), tech & it services (class 42). Its most recent moves were into advertising & retail (2011), medical & beauty care (2004), tech & it services (1997).
Eli Lilly trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/eli-lilly-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html
Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.
| Class | Marks | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Pharmaceuticals | 179 | 82.9% | 1942 |
| 10 Medical devices | 13 | 6.0% | 1992 |
| 42 Tech & IT services | 7 | 3.2% | 1997 |
| 9 Electronics & software | 4 | 1.9% | 1996 |
| 44 Medical & beauty care | 3 | 1.4% | 2004 |
| 16 Paper & print | 2 | 0.9% | 1966 |
| 41 Education & entertainment | 2 | 0.9% | 1996 |
| 1 Chemicals | 1 | 0.5% | 1958 |
The brands Eli Lilly protects most
The word marks and logo names Eli Lilly has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.
| # | Brand | Trademarks | Classes | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LILLY | 5 | 4 | 1942–2011 |
| 2 | CATERS | 4 | 4 | 1996–1996 |
| 3 | BECAUSE DEPRESSION HURTS | 2 | 2 | 2004–2004 |
| 4 | HUMULIN | 2 | 2 | 1981–1999 |
| 5 | TEAMMATE | 2 | 2 | 2015–2015 |
| 6 | ELEMETRA | 2 | 1 | 1999–2020 |
| 7 | STRATERA | 2 | 1 | 1998–2000 |
| 8 | ABASAGLAR | 1 | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| 9 | ABEMLIRU | 1 | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| 10 | ADCIRCA | 1 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| 11 | ADVAZULAR | 1 | 1 | 2004–2004 |
| 12 | AFFINITAC | 1 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| 13 | ALIMTA | 1 | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| 14 | AMESEC | 1 | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| 15 | ANSWERS THAT MATTER | 1 | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Logos filed most often (since 2020)
Eli Lilly's logos
The 1 different logos Eli Lilly has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.
How quickly its trademarks are registered
Over the last five years, Eli Lilly's marks took a median of 1.8 years from filing to registration, faster than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 0.8 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.
Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.
Who files the most in Eli Lilly's classes
Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Eli Lilly's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Eli Lilly's market position, not who is most like it.
In the last five years, Eli Lilly was #18 of 2,050 filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), with 40 of 6,111 trademarks.
Eli Lilly's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.
Top trademark filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), South Africa 1975–2024: Eli Lilly
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/eli-lilly-south-african-trademarks/class-5-race-video.html
Main competitors – the companies most like Eli Lilly
Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Eli Lilly's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.
Eli Lilly's closest competitors in South Africa are Teva Pharmaceuticals, Alkem Laboratories, Austell Pharmaceuticals and Sandoz.
Eli Lilly trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/eli-lilly-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html
Trademark filings per year: Eli Lilly (orange) and its five closest competitors.
| # | Company | Relationship | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teva Pharmaceuticals | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 2 | Alkem Laboratories | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 3 | Austell Pharmaceuticals | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 4 | Sandoz | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 5 | Acino Pharma | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 6 | Forrester Pharma | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 7 | Abex Pharmaceutica | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 8 | AstraZeneca | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 9 | Lamar International | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 10 | Aspen Pharmacare | Direct competitor | 70% |
Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.
Eli Lilly – relevant export countries
South Africa exported US$1.8 billion of the goods Eli Lilly's main classes cover in the last year – pharmaceutical preparations; diabetes; cancer; dermatitis (class 5); medical devices; suture materials; medical apparatus and instruments (class 10); computer software; software; computer hardware (class 9); books; posters; stickers (class 16); chemicals; fertilizers; chemical preparations (class 1). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Eli Lilly's trademarks matter most.
Adjust the weightings
These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.
Worldwide
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Union | 77 | US$214 m | -0% | National | US$2,388 |
| 2 | United States of America | 73 | US$103 m | +2% | National | US$3,425 |
| 3 | United Kingdom | 67 | US$27 m | -5% | National | US$1,371 |
| 4 | Japan | 62 | US$4.6 m | -4% | National | US$1,774 |
| 5 | Namibia | 61 | US$194 m | +30% | ARIPO | US$450 |
| 6 | Zimbabwe | 60 | US$198 m | +33% | ARIPO | US$450 |
| 7 | Canada | 60 | US$5.8 m | -4% | National | US$2,192 |
| 8 | Switzerland | 60 | US$1.5 m | +17% | National | US$1,660 |
| 9 | Türkiye | 60 | US$15 m | -4% | National | US$1,258 |
| 10 | Australia | 60 | US$27 m | -7% | National | US$2,380 |
Africa
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 5 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Namibia | 61 | US$194 m | +30% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 2 | Zimbabwe | 60 | US$198 m | +33% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 3 | Zambia | 58 | US$343 m | +5% | National | US$2,610 |
| 4 | Malawi | 54 | US$19 m | +66% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 5 | Nigeria | 54 | US$15 m | -20% | National | US$1,015 S&Z |
| 6 | Botswana | 53 | US$155 m | -15% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 7 | Eswatini | 53 | US$75 m | -14% | National | US$446 |
| 8 | Mozambique | 52 | US$77 m | -18% | ARIPO | US$450 S&Z |
| 9 | Algeria | 52 | US$1.2 m | +11% | National | US$1,445 |
| 10 | Lesotho | 52 | US$43 m | +7% | National | US$326 |
SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.
Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z
| Brand | Classes | Nigeria | OAPI (17 states) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LILLY | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| CATERS | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| BECAUSE DEPRESSION HURTS | 2 | US$406 | US$1,009 |
| HUMULIN | 2 | US$406 | US$1,009 |
| TEAMMATE | 2 | US$406 | US$1,009 |
S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.
TM Country Selection Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.
Word marks you may have considered opposing
For Eli Lilly's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Eli Lilly's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.
Similar to LILLY (classes 1, 3, 5, 35; searched 2022-11-30 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to CATERS (classes 9, 16, 38, 41; searched 2025-11-26 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to BECAUSE DEPRESSION HURTS (classes 5, 44; searched 2018-09-26 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to HUMULIN (classes 5, 10; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to TEAMMATE (classes 9, 10; searched 2023-03-29 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.
How S&Z can help you
S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.
We manage your trademarks – not just file them
Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:
Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices
S&Z prices – South African trademarks
| Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificate | US$240 |
| Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same time | US$225 |
| Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing) | R1,027 ≈ US$62.29 |
Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.
Eli Lilly's next five years of renewals
58 of Eli Lilly's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$3,613 over the five years.
Eli Lilly: frequently asked questions
What should Eli Lilly consider for its trademarks?
- Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Zimbabwe and Malawi – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Eli Lilly – relevant export countries”).
- Brand coverage: Because Depression Hurts, Humulin, Teammate are protected in only one or two classes – check whether related goods or services (for example merchandise or online services) need cover too.
- Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.