Distell – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

Distell, now part of Heineken Beverages, is a South African producer of wines, spirits and ciders. Its brands include Savanna, Hunter's and Klipdrift.

How Distell has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#49largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
927trademarks filed
5different logos published since 2020
23of 45 classes used
1921first trademark filed
25filed in the last 10 years

Distell trademarks in 45 seconds

Distell trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/distell-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

Distell filed its first South African trademark in 1921 and has filed 927 since; its busiest year was 1964, with 85 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
Distell9321921–2024
Stellenbosch Farmers Services12007–2007

Where Distell expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. Distell's portfolio is concentrated in wines & spirits (class 33), beer & soft drinks (class 32), tech & it services (class 42). Its most recent moves were into legal & security (2020), toys & sports goods (2013), lighting & appliances (2006).

Distell trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Distell trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/distell-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
33 Wines & spirits68073.4%1921
32 Beer & soft drinks9910.7%1921
42 Tech & IT services192.0%1972
30 Coffee, flour & sweets131.4%1960
29 Meat, dairy & oils131.4%1960
34 Tobacco131.4%1963
16 Paper & print121.3%1964
31 Fresh produce & pet food121.3%1960

The brands Distell protects most

The word marks and logo names Distell has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1LIEBERSTEIN1981960–2020
2SFW1851968–1982
3TASSENBERG13101949–2011
4GRAND MOUSSEUX1381943–2020
5LA GRATITUDE1281937–2020
6MELLOW-WOOD1271960–1982
7LIBERTAS1091941–1972
8COSSACK991956–1972
9OOM TAS981954–1972
10TASHEIMER981957–1972
11S STELLENBOSCH FARMERS'WINERY881964–1964
12GRACA751985–2005
13CROWN721947–2020
14CHILLER PAK552006–2006
15KELLERPRINZ BRAAI551981–1981

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

Distell trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Distell trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Distell trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Distell trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Distell trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class

Distell's logos

The 5 different logos Distell has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, Distell's marks took a median of 2.2 years from filing to registration, faster than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.8 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in Distell's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Distell's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Distell's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, Distell was #16 of 1,088 filers in class 33 (wines & spirits), with 12 of 2,324 trademarks; #301 of 905 filers in class 32 (beer & soft drinks), with 2 of 1,804 trademarks.

Distell's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 33 (wines & spirits), South Africa 1975–2024: Distell

Top trademark filers in class 33 (wines & spirits), South Africa 1975–2024: Distell

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/distell-south-african-trademarks/class-33-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like Distell

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Distell's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

Distell's closest competitors in South Africa are DGB, Charles Back Trademark Trust, Spier and KWV.

Distell trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Distell trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/distell-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: Distell (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1DGBDirect competitor100%
2Charles Back Trademark TrustDirect competitor90%
3SpierDirect competitor80%
4KWVDirect competitor80%
5SABDirect competitor80%
6SuntoryDirect competitor70%
7Irish Distillers InternationalDirect competitor70%
8Bacardi andDirect competitor70%
9Time Being of the Aj and F Charnaud Tru…Direct competitor70%
10Sazerac BrandsDirect competitor70%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

Distell – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$3.1 billion of the goods Distell's main classes cover in the last year – alcoholic beverages; beer; wine; alcoholic preparations (class 33); beer; fruit juices; syrups; mineral and aerated waters (class 32); tea; coffee; bread (class 30); meat; fish; jams (class 29); lighters; dried cannabis; electronic cigarettes (class 34). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Distell's trademarks matter most.

Where South Africa exports Distell's top goods

Distell's trademarks most often cover alcoholic beverages, beer, tea, meat and lighters. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 75% of its exports of them in 2024.

South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones Distell's specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union83US$647 m+4%NationalUS$2,388
2United States of America73US$183 m-0%NationalUS$3,425
3United Kingdom72US$198 m+4%NationalUS$1,371
4China70US$59 m-8%NationalUS$1,224
5Japan63US$43 m-5%NationalUS$1,774
6Hong Kong SAR58US$18 m+1%NationalUS$1,715
7Nigeria56US$25 m-2%NationalUS$1,015
8Philippines55US$3.7 m-0%NationalUS$1,526
9Mozambique55US$202 m+5%ARIPOUS$450
10Ukraine54US$2.1 m+34%NationalUS$1,375

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Nigeria56US$25 m-2%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
2Mozambique55US$202 m+5%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
3Lesotho54US$126 m-1%NationalUS$326
4OAPI (17 states)54US$20 m+7%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z
5Botswana53US$237 m-3%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
6Zimbabwe52US$117 m+6%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
7Eswatini52US$98 m-4%NationalUS$446
8Egypt51US$11 m-3%NationalUS$2,278
9Algeria49US$384 k+56%NationalUS$1,445
10Mauritius48US$57 m+4%NationalUS$1,154

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
LIEBERSTEIN8US$1,624US$2,117
SFW5US$1,015US$1,563
TASSENBERG10US$2,030US$2,487
GRAND MOUSSEUX8US$1,624US$2,117
LA GRATITUDE8US$1,624US$2,117

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For Distell's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Distell's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to LIEBERSTEIN (classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 42; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to SFW (classes 32, 33, 35, 42, 43; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to TASSENBERG (classes 30, 32, 33, 34, 42; searched 2022-10-26 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to GRAND MOUSSEUX (classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 42; searched 2018-02-28 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to LA GRATITUDE (classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 42; searched 2018-06-27 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

Distell's next five years of renewals

157 of Distell's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$9,780 over the five years.

Distell: frequently asked questions

What should Distell consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Nigeria, Mozambique and OAPI (17 states) – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Distell – relevant export countries”).
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which are the top export countries for Distell's goods?
For the five goods Distell's trademarks cover most, South Africa's largest export markets in 2024 were Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia, Lesotho and United Arab Emirates. The ten markets in the chart take 75% of these exports, and 75% of that goes to other African countries. The largest of these markets per good: alcoholic beverages (US$267 million): Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique; beer (US$110 million): Zambia, Botswana, Eswatini; tea (US$28 million): Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia; meat (US$402 million): United Arab Emirates, Mozambique, Jordan; lighters (US$1 million): Namibia, Botswana, Zambia. Exports to Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho and Eswatini move freely within the Southern African Customs Union, but a South African trademark does not protect a brand there – each country needs its own registration (or an ARIPO designation). These are national export figures for the goods, not the company's own sales. Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Which of Distell's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of Distell's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: LA GRATITUDE (first filed 1937, most recently 2020); GRAND MOUSSEUX (first filed 1943, most recently 2020); CROWN (first filed 1947, most recently 2020); LIEBERSTEIN (first filed 1960, most recently 2020); HUNTER'S (first filed 1995, most recently 2016). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does Distell launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, Distell filed about 1.8 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, fewer than the 1.8 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2015, with 3. Its closest competitors averaged 4.4 new brand names a year over the same period (DGB 8.8, Charles Back Trademark Trust 2.6, Spier 3.0, KWV 6.6, SAB 1.0). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does Distell protect each brand?
Distell has filed 622 different brand names. 89% of them are protected in a single class, while 15 cover five classes or more – the widest is TASSENBERG, in 10 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does Distell usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, Distell filed most often in October (21% of its filings), December (21%) and June (18%); the busiest quarter was Q4 (50%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
How long do Distell's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do Distell's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can Distell do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to Distell's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to Distell and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.