Deutsche Telekom – South African trademarks
Updated 8 November 2026
Deutsche Telekom is a German telecommunications company. It operates mobile and fixed networks in Europe and, through T-Mobile, in the United States.
How Deutsche Telekom has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.
Download report (PDF)Deutsche Telekom trademarks in 45 seconds
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/deutsche-telekom-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html
A portfolio built over time
Deutsche Telekom filed its first South African trademark in 1995 and has filed 824 since; its busiest year was 1995, with 153 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.
Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.
The names behind the portfolio
Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.
| Name | Marks | Filing years |
|---|---|---|
| Deutsche Telekom | 837 | 1995–2019 |
Where Deutsche Telekom expanded its business
Trademark classes show what a business sells. Deutsche Telekom's portfolio is concentrated in tech & it services (class 42), electronics & software (class 9), telecoms (class 38). Its most recent moves were into cosmetics & cleaning (2017), restaurants & hotels (2017), kitchenware (2017).
Deutsche Telekom trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2019
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/deutsche-telekom-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html
Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.
| Class | Marks | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 Tech & IT services | 113 | 13.7% | 1995 |
| 9 Electronics & software | 107 | 13.0% | 1995 |
| 38 Telecoms | 101 | 12.3% | 1995 |
| 16 Paper & print | 97 | 11.8% | 1995 |
| 36 Finance & insurance | 90 | 10.9% | 1995 |
| 35 Advertising & retail | 69 | 8.4% | 1998 |
| 37 Construction & repair | 56 | 6.8% | 1995 |
| 41 Education & entertainment | 53 | 6.4% | 1995 |
The brands Deutsche Telekom protects most
The word marks and logo names Deutsche Telekom has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.
| # | Brand | Trademarks | Classes | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-SYSTEMS | 73 | 16 | 2000–2019 |
| 2 | T-MOBILE | 57 | 14 | 1995–2008 |
| 3 | .T...HOME. | 50 | 15 | 2007–2008 |
| 4 | Magenta | 22 | 22 | 2016–2017 |
| 5 | DEBIS | 22 | 11 | 1999–1999 |
| 6 | T-ONLINE | 22 | 11 | 1995–2003 |
| 7 | CONGSTAR | 18 | 13 | 2007–2008 |
| 8 | T COM | 14 | 11 | 2000–2000 |
| 9 | T PROFI | 14 | 7 | 1995–1995 |
| 10 | T-SYSTEM | 14 | 7 | 1995–1995 |
| 11 | TEAM T-MOBILE | 12 | 12 | 2003–2003 |
| 12 | T INFO | 12 | 7 | 2000–2000 |
| 13 | T-CARD | 12 | 6 | 1995–1995 |
| 14 | T-NET | 12 | 6 | 1995–1995 |
| 15 | DTEL | 11 | 11 | 1996–1996 |
Logos filed most often (since 2020)
Deutsche Telekom's logos
The 1 different logos Deutsche Telekom has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.
How quickly its trademarks are registered
Over the last five years, Deutsche Telekom's marks took a median of 4.7 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 2.0 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.
Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.
Who files the most in Deutsche Telekom's classes
Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Deutsche Telekom's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Deutsche Telekom's market position, not who is most like it.
Deutsche Telekom's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.
Top trademark filers in class 42 (tech & IT services), South Africa 1975–2024: Deutsche Telekom
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/deutsche-telekom-south-african-trademarks/class-42-race-video.html
Main competitors – the companies most like Deutsche Telekom
Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Deutsche Telekom's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.
Deutsche Telekom's closest competitors in South Africa are Telkom.
Deutsche Telekom trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/deutsche-telekom-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html
Trademark filings per year: Deutsche Telekom (orange) and its five closest competitors.
| # | Company | Relationship | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telkom | Direct competitor | 76% |
| 2 | Eoh Mthombo | 64% | |
| 3 | Brother Industries | 62% | |
| 4 | Suning International Services | Retailer's own brands | 63% |
| 5 | Aldi | Retailer's own brands | 63% |
| 6 | General Electric | Other field | 78% |
| 7 | BMW | Other field | 76% |
| 8 | University of Pretoria | Other field | 67% |
| 9 | Hyundai Motor | Other field | 66% |
| 10 | dsm-firmenich | Other field | 64% |
Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.
Deutsche Telekom – relevant export countries
Adjust the weightings
These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.
Worldwide
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 2 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Union | 74 | US$20 m | +2% | National | US$1,594 |
| 2 | United States of America | 73 | US$7.3 m | +6% | National | US$1,400 |
| 3 | United Kingdom | 66 | US$6.8 m | -3% | National | US$833 |
| 4 | Hong Kong SAR | 62 | US$1.6 m | +14% | National | US$807 |
| 5 | Singapore | 60 | US$815 k | +34% | National | US$888 |
| 6 | India | 59 | US$102 k | -4% | National | US$563 |
| 7 | Canada | 56 | US$682 k | -5% | National | US$1,338 |
| 8 | Namibia | 56 | US$40 m | +16% | ARIPO | US$290 |
| 9 | Australia | 56 | US$1.9 m | -4% | National | US$1,300 |
| 10 | China | 55 | US$267 k | +2% | National | US$505 |
Africa
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 2 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Namibia | 56 | US$40 m | +16% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 2 | Mozambique | 50 | US$21 m | +21% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 3 | Zimbabwe | 50 | US$24 m | +11% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 4 | Botswana | 49 | US$38 m | -25% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 5 | Nigeria | 47 | US$1.2 m | -13% | National | US$406 S&Z |
| 6 | Eswatini | 47 | US$18 m | -0% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 7 | Malawi | 45 | US$5.6 m | +26% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 8 | Uganda | 44 | US$2.5 m | +23% | ARIPO | US$290 S&Z |
| 9 | OAPI (17 states) | 43 | US$3.7 m | +1% | National | US$1,009 S&Z |
| 10 | Egypt | 42 | US$96 k | -18% | National | US$950 |
SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 2 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$269 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.
Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z
| Brand | Classes | Nigeria | OAPI (17 states) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-SYSTEMS | 16 | US$3,248 | US$3,595 |
| T-MOBILE | 14 | US$2,842 | US$3,225 |
| .T...HOME. | 15 | US$3,045 | US$3,410 |
| Magenta | 22 | US$4,466 | US$4,703 |
| DEBIS | 11 | US$2,233 | US$2,671 |
S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.
TM Country Selection Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.
Word marks you may have considered opposing
For Deutsche Telekom's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Deutsche Telekom's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.
Similar to T-SYSTEMS (classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to T-MOBILE (classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to .T...HOME. (classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to Magenta (classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42; searched 2018-03-28 to 2026-11-07)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to DEBIS (classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42; searched 2020-06-24 to 2026-11-07)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.
How S&Z can help you
S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.
We manage your trademarks – not just file them
Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:
Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices
S&Z prices – South African trademarks
| Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificate | US$240 |
| Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same time | US$225 |
| Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing) | R1,027 ≈ US$62.29 |
Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.
Deutsche Telekom's next five years of renewals
67 of Deutsche Telekom's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$4,173 over the five years.
Deutsche Telekom: frequently asked questions
What should Deutsche Telekom consider for its trademarks?
- Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 4 (oils & fuels), class 2 (paints) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
- Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 0.6 to 0.0 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
- Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.