Amka – South African trademarks

Updated 8 November 2026

Amka is a South African manufacturer of personal care and household products, selling under its own range of hair care, skin care and cleaning brands.

How Amka has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.

Download report (PDF)
#63largest trademark owner in South Africa (of 121,626)
828trademarks filed
29different logos published since 2020
22of 45 classes used
1918first trademark filed
249filed in the last 10 years

Amka trademarks in 45 seconds

Amka trademarks in 45 seconds

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/amka-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html

A portfolio built over time

Amka filed its first South African trademark in 1918 and has filed 828 since; its busiest year was 1994, with 67 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.

Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.

The names behind the portfolio

Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.

NameMarksFiling years
Amka9101918–2024
Amka Brands862006–2024

Where Amka expanded its business

Trademark classes show what a business sells. Amka's portfolio is concentrated in cosmetics & cleaning (class 3), pharmaceuticals (class 5), chemicals (class 1). Its most recent moves were into fresh produce & pet food (2022), medical & beauty care (2020), electronics & software (2020).

Amka trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Amka trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/amka-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html

Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.

ClassMarksShareSince
3 Cosmetics & cleaning69884.3%1918
5 Pharmaceuticals617.4%1961
1 Chemicals121.4%1996
25 Clothing101.2%1969
10 Medical devices60.7%1993
16 Paper & print50.6%1995
26 Haberdashery40.5%1989
42 Tech & IT services40.5%1982

The brands Amka protects most

The word marks and logo names Amka has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.

#BrandTrademarksClassesFiled
1AMKA751987–2015
2CLERE751965–2020
3GILL721961–1995
4DENTAZYME641988–1995
5VINOLIA641918–1995
6CUTICURA551992–2020
7PLAYGIRL ACCESSORIES, SHOES AND BAGS552024–2024
8SHOWER TO SHOWER521969–1989
9DENTY441996–1996
10MARTINIQUE441982–1996
11DOCTENE421971–1975
12EASY WAVES421985–1990
13Bio-Assist332022–2022
14CELLTONE332019–2020
15CLERE PURE & PROTECT332015–2020

Logos filed most often (since 2020)

Amka trademark logo
6 filings · 2 classes
Amka trademark logo
3 filings · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
2 filings · 2 classes
Amka trademark logo
2 filings · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
2 filings · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class
Amka trademark logo
1 filing · 1 class

Amka's logos

The 29 different logos Amka has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.

How quickly its trademarks are registered

Over the last five years, Amka's marks took a median of 2.9 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 1.6 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.

Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.

Who files the most in Amka's classes

Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Amka's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Amka's market position, not who is most like it.

In the last five years, Amka was #2 of 1,836 filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), with 92 of 3,958 trademarks; #104 of 2,050 filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), with 9 of 6,111 trademarks; #155 of 947 filers in class 1 (chemicals), with 3 of 2,054 trademarks.

Amka's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.

Top trademark filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), South Africa 1975–2024: Amka

Top trademark filers in class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), South Africa 1975–2024: Amka

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/amka-south-african-trademarks/class-3-race-video.html

Main competitors – the companies most like Amka

Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Amka's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.

Amka's closest competitors in South Africa are L'Oreal, Unilever, Beiersdorf and LVMH.

Amka trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Amka trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024

Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/amka-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html

Trademark filings per year: Amka (orange) and its five closest competitors.

#CompanyRelationshipSimilarity
1L'OrealDirect competitor100%
2UnileverDirect competitor94%
3BeiersdorfDirect competitor82%
4LVMHDirect competitor80%
5Indigo BrandsDirect competitor80%
6Bora CreationsDirect competitor80%
7Clinique LaboratoriesDirect competitor80%
8Colgate-PalmoliveDirect competitor80%
9Make Up Art CosmeticsDirect competitor80%
10Skin Glow CosmeticsDirect competitor79%

Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.

Amka – relevant export countries

South Africa exported US$4.7 billion of the goods Amka's main classes cover in the last year – cosmetics; essential oils; dentifrices; perfumery (class 3); dietary supplements; disinfectants; veterinary preparations; plasters (class 5); chemicals; fertilizers; adhesives; unprocessed plastics (class 1); clothing; footwear; headwear (class 25); suture materials; artificial limbs; surgical; masks (class 10). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Amka's trademarks matter most.

Where South Africa exports Amka's top goods

Amka's trademarks most often cover cosmetics, dietary supplements, chemicals, clothing and suture materials. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 67% of its exports of them in 2024.

South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones Amka's specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.

Adjust the weightings

These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.

Worldwide

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1European Union79US$447 m-2%NationalUS$2,388
2United States of America73US$211 m-5%NationalUS$3,425
3United Kingdom68US$95 m-6%NationalUS$1,371
4Namibia64US$548 m+13%ARIPOUS$450
5Zimbabwe63US$475 m+18%ARIPOUS$450
6Japan63US$16 m-6%NationalUS$1,774
7Canada61US$14 m-6%NationalUS$2,192
8Australia60US$64 m-6%NationalUS$2,380
9Switzerland60US$9.8 m+11%NationalUS$1,660
10Botswana60US$487 m-6%ARIPOUS$450

Africa

#MarketScoreSA exportsImport growth / yrRouteCost, 5 classes
1Namibia64US$548 m+13%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
2Zimbabwe63US$475 m+18%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
3Botswana60US$487 m-6%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
4Nigeria58US$95 m-14%NationalUS$1,015 S&Z
5Zambia57US$616 m+2%NationalUS$2,610
6Malawi57US$107 m+52%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
7Eswatini55US$234 m-9%NationalUS$446
8OAPI (17 states)54US$54 m+4%NationalUS$1,563 S&Z
9Tanzania54US$41 m-5%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z
10Mozambique54US$195 m-19%ARIPOUS$450 S&Z

SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 5 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$301 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.

Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.

Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z

BrandClassesNigeriaOAPI (17 states)
AMKA5US$1,015US$1,563
CLERE5US$1,015US$1,563
GILL2US$406US$1,009
DENTAZYME4US$812US$1,378
VINOLIA4US$812US$1,378

S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.

TM Country Selection  Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.

Word marks you may have considered opposing

For Amka's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Amka's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.

Similar to AMKA (classes 1, 3, 5, 35, 42; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similar to CLERE (classes 3, 5, 9, 10, 16; searched 2018-01-31 to 2026-11-07)

MarkPublishedClassApplicant
CLEAR2023-07-263Unilever Global IP Ltd
CLEAR2022-09-283Unilever Global IP Ltd

Similar to GILL (classes 3, 5; no close matches in the search)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.

Similar to DENTAZYME (classes 3, 5, 16, 25; searched 2022-05-25 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similar to VINOLIA (classes 3, 5, 21, 25; searched 2018-10-31 to 2026-11-07)

No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.

Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.

How S&Z can help you

S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.

We manage your trademarks – not just file them

Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:

Renewal managementEvery renewal date in your portfolio tracked and paid online.
Competitor watchGet real-time competitor analysis.
Similar-mark watchNew word marks that come close to yours, found as they are published using SimTM.
Expansion into AfricaLowest-cost trademark expansion into Africa - Nigeria, OAPI.

Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices

S&Z prices – South African trademarks

Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificateUS$240
Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same timeUS$225
Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing)R1,027
≈ US$62.29

Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.

Amka's next five years of renewals

280 of Amka's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$17,441 over the five years.

Amka: frequently asked questions

What should Amka consider for its trademarks?
  • Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Zimbabwe and Botswana – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Amka – relevant export countries”).
  • Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 41 (education & entertainment), class 24 (textiles) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
  • Brand coverage: Gill is protected in only one or two classes – check whether related goods or services (for example merchandise or online services) need cover too.
  • Similar marks: we found 2 word marks of other companies that we consider confusingly similar to its top brands (see “Word marks you may have considered opposing”) – a watch service flags new ones while they can still be opposed.
  • Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 28.4 to 15.4 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
  • Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.
Which are the top export countries for Amka's goods?
For the five goods Amka's trademarks cover most, South Africa's largest export markets in 2024 were Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Germany and Zambia. The ten markets in the chart take 67% of these exports, and 78% of that goes to other African countries. The largest of these markets per good: cosmetics (US$327 million): Botswana, Namibia, United States; dietary supplements (US$261 million): Zimbabwe, Namibia, Botswana; chemicals (US$467 million): Germany, Zimbabwe, United States; clothing (US$411 million): Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini; suture materials (US$10 million): Namibia, Botswana, Zambia. Exports to Namibia, Botswana, Eswatini and Lesotho move freely within the Southern African Customs Union, but a South African trademark does not protect a brand there – each country needs its own registration (or an ARIPO designation). These are national export figures for the goods, not the company's own sales. Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Which of Amka's brands have been protected the longest?
Several of Amka's brands have been protected for generations and are still being filed today: CLERE (first filed 1965, most recently 2020); PLAYBOY (first filed 1970, most recently 2017); PLAYGIRL (first filed 1973, most recently 2023); CUTICURA (first filed 1992, most recently 2020); CLERE RADIANCE (first filed 2012, most recently 2018). Brands that are refiled over decades – in new classes, new logos or updated packaging – keep their protection current as the business changes.
How many new brands does Amka launch each year?
Counting only brand names it had never filed before, Amka filed about 15.4 new brand names a year over the last five complete years, fewer than the 28.4 a year in the five years before; its busiest year in the last decade was 2017, with 40. Its closest competitors averaged 10.1 new brand names a year over the same period (L'Oreal 26.0, Unilever 5.4, Beiersdorf 7.8, LVMH 9.0, Indigo Brands 2.4). New brand names are a good indicator of product launches and innovation.
How broadly does Amka protect each brand?
Amka has filed 655 different brand names. 92% of them are protected in a single class, while 4 cover five classes or more – the widest is CLERE, in 5 classes. A brand used beyond its core product (merchandise, services, related goods) needs protection in each of those classes: in South Africa each class is a separate application.
When in the year does Amka usually file trademarks?
Over the last ten years, Amka filed most often in May (19% of its filings), October (18%) and March (12%); the busiest quarter was Q2 (35%). Filing well before a launch matters: rights in South Africa date from the filing date, and examination can take more than a year.
Which classes do Amka's competitors protect that Amka does not?
Several of Amka's closest competitors have filed since 2015 in classes Amka has never used: class 41 (education & entertainment, 4 of its top five competitors); class 24 (textiles, 3 of its top five competitors); class 36 (finance & insurance, 3 of its top five competitors); class 45 (legal & security, 2 of its top five competitors). These are not necessarily gaps – they may reflect different products – but they are worth reviewing against the goods and services the business actually offers or plans.
How do retailers' own brands compete with Amka in trademarks?
Retailers' house brands are a growing presence in Amka's market. In class 3 (cosmetics & cleaning), Clicks filed 1% of all trademarks in 2020–2024, compared with 0% in 2005–2014. Retailers are often a brand owner's largest customers and, through their own brands, also its competitors.
Why did some of Amka's trademarks take more than five years to register?
Of Amka's trademarks registered in the last two years, 41% had waited more than four years since filing. Almost all of that time is examination: the South African registry has been working through a backlog, so many applications filed in 2020–2022 are only now being accepted. Once a mark is accepted, it is advertised and normally registered within about six months. Prompt responses to the registry's examination reports (office actions) avoid adding further delay.
How long do Amka's South African trademarks last, and when must they be renewed?
A South African trademark registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten-year periods indefinitely. Renewal can be paid in the months before the due date, and a six-month grace period applies after it, with a late-payment fee; a mark that is not renewed is removed from the register. A registered mark can also be challenged if it has not been used for five years or more, so use matters as much as renewal.
Do Amka's South African trademarks protect its brands elsewhere in Africa?
No – trademarks are territorial, and a South African registration covers South Africa only. South Africa is not a member of the Madrid system, so international registration is not available to South African applicants. Protection elsewhere in Africa comes from national filings (for example Nigeria), a single OAPI registration covering 17 West and Central African states, or a regional ARIPO application designating member states such as Botswana, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. S&Z files in all of these, including Nigeria together with South Africa (SANi).
What can Amka do if someone files a mark similar to one of its brands?
When a new application is advertised for opposition, the owner of an earlier, similar mark can oppose it – in South Africa within three months of the advertisement (this period can be extended). After registration, a conflicting mark can still be challenged through rectification of the register, and use of a confusingly similar mark can be stopped through an infringement action. The key is seeing new applications in time, which is what a similar-mark watch does.
What is SimTM?
SimTM is the similar-trademark technology behind GlobalIPCo's South African trademark watching services, which S&Z uses. It identifies newly published trademarks that sound or look similar to a registered mark, at four levels of sensitivity that progressively widen the marks flagged – from the most relevant to marks of more general interest. It is fast enough to check every trademark journal as it is published, so owners can be alerted to similar marks while they can still be opposed within the three-month opposition period. The word marks listed under “Word marks you may have considered opposing” were found with SimTM's two closest levels and then reviewed, so only marks we consider confusingly similar to Amka's brands are shown.
How accurate is the information on this page?
The figures, charts and videos on this page are based on trademark and trade data obtained by S&Z, and are only as accurate as that data. Records can be incomplete, delayed or contain errors, and linking marks to Amka and its group companies involves judgement. S&Z therefore does not guarantee that all the information is 100% accurate or complete. It is a general overview, not legal advice: please contact S&Z before relying on it for a filing, renewal, opposition or other decision.