Arysta LifeScience – South African trademarks
Updated 8 November 2026
Arysta LifeScience supplies crop protection products and biological solutions to farmers. It is part of UPL, a global agricultural solutions group.
How Arysta LifeScience has built and protected its brands in South Africa – its trademark portfolio, where it expanded, how quickly its marks are registered, and who it competes with.
Download report (PDF)Arysta LifeScience trademarks in 45 seconds
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/arysta-lifescience-south-african-trademarks/overview-video.html
A portfolio built over time
Arysta LifeScience filed its first South African trademark in 1960 and has filed 242 since; its busiest year was 2008, with 39 new filings. The chart shows its filings per year from 1970.
Trademarks by filing year, up to 2024; applications still pending are not included.
The names behind the portfolio
Over the years the group has filed under several names – earlier company names, holding companies and subsidiaries. We count them together.
| Name | Marks | Filing years |
|---|---|---|
| Arysta LifeScience | 280 | 1987–2020 |
| Volcano Agroscience | 140 | 2000–2010 |
| Arysta Lifescience | 41 | 1960–2016 |
| Arysta Lifescience North America | 4 | 1999–2012 |
| Arysta Lifescience Benelux | 2 | 1998–2007 |
Where Arysta LifeScience expanded its business
Trademark classes show what a business sells. Arysta LifeScience's portfolio is concentrated in pharmaceuticals (class 5), chemicals (class 1), electronics & software (class 9). Its most recent moves were into education & entertainment (2017), lighting & appliances (2011), electronics & software (2009).
Arysta LifeScience trademarks: expansion into trademark classes, 1970–2020
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/arysta-lifescience-south-african-trademarks/class-expansion-video.html
Each tile is a class; it lights up when the group first files in it and darkens with more filings; the dots show how many of its closest rivals also file in that class. The chart compares the number of classes used with its rivals. The video runs from 1970; classes entered earlier are lit from the start.
| Class | Marks | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Pharmaceuticals | 193 | 79.8% | 1960 |
| 1 Chemicals | 29 | 12.0% | 1964 |
| 9 Electronics & software | 6 | 2.5% | 2009 |
| 11 Lighting & appliances | 3 | 1.2% | 2011 |
| 35 Advertising & retail | 3 | 1.2% | 2008 |
| 42 Tech & IT services | 3 | 1.2% | 2000 |
| 44 Medical & beauty care | 3 | 1.2% | 2008 |
| 41 Education & entertainment | 2 | 0.8% | 2017 |
The brands Arysta LifeScience protects most
The word marks and logo names Arysta LifeScience has filed most often – the same brand filed in more classes, in more versions or again over the years.
| # | Brand | Trademarks | Classes | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CROPVISION | 8 | 4 | 2017–2017 |
| 2 | IVM | 4 | 4 | 2008–2008 |
| 3 | GALELA KAKUHLE | 4 | 3 | 2017–2017 |
| 4 | ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE | 4 | 2 | 2005–2015 |
| 5 | ARYSTA | 2 | 2 | 2015–2015 |
| 6 | BIOZYME | 2 | 2 | 2014–2014 |
| 7 | CALIGUR | 2 | 2 | 1998–1998 |
| 8 | CHEMIGATION | 2 | 2 | 2011–2011 |
| 9 | EN-HYDRO | 2 | 2 | 2011–2011 |
| 10 | EVEREST | 2 | 2 | 1999–1999 |
| 11 | GETALOT-AGRI | 2 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
| 12 | GRANUZEB | 2 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
| 13 | MANCODEX | 2 | 2 | 2020–2020 |
| 14 | OGIVE | 2 | 2 | 2014–2014 |
| 15 | PESTIGATION | 2 | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Logos filed most often (since 2020)
Arysta LifeScience's logos
The 4 different logos Arysta LifeScience has had published since 2020 – each logo shown once, however many classes or versions it was filed in. Logos protected in more classes come first.
How quickly its trademarks are registered
Over the last five years, Arysta LifeScience's marks took a median of 4.8 years from filing to registration, slower than the market's 2.7 years. Most of that time is examination: 4.4 years from filing to acceptance (market: 1.9). Registration itself follows about half a year after acceptance.
Median years from filing to registration per registration year, split into examination (filing → acceptance) and acceptance → registration; the dashed line is the market median. A high recent value means older applications came through that year.
Who files the most in Arysta LifeScience's classes
Ranked by number of trademarks filed in Arysta LifeScience's main classes – any company that files there, whatever else it does (including retailers' own brands). This shows Arysta LifeScience's market position, not who is most like it.
In the last five years, Arysta LifeScience was #747 of 2,050 filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), with 2 of 6,111 trademarks; #202 of 947 filers in class 1 (chemicals), with 2 of 2,054 trademarks; #808 of 4,926 filers in class 9 (electronics & software), with 3 of 10,252 trademarks.
Arysta LifeScience's share of all trademarks filed in each of its main classes, per filing year.
Top trademark filers in class 5 (pharmaceuticals), South Africa 1975–2024: Arysta LifeScience
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/arysta-lifescience-south-african-trademarks/class-5-race-video.html
Main competitors – the companies most like Arysta LifeScience
Ranked by how similar their whole trademark portfolio is to Arysta LifeScience's – the same mix of classes and the same words in their marks – not by size. Large filers in its classes that do something different rank lower here.
Arysta LifeScience's closest competitors in South Africa are N Laboratories, Rolfes Agri, Madumbi Sustainable Agriculture and AECI.
Arysta LifeScience trademarks vs competitors: filings per year, 2010–2024
Watch the video on its own page, with transcript – https://snz.co.za/trademark-country-selection-direct/arysta-lifescience-south-african-trademarks/competitors-video.html
Trademark filings per year: Arysta LifeScience (orange) and its five closest competitors.
| # | Company | Relationship | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N Laboratories | Direct competitor | 98% |
| 2 | Rolfes Agri | Direct competitor | 80% |
| 3 | Madumbi Sustainable Agriculture | Direct competitor | 76% |
| 4 | AECI | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 5 | Dagutat Science | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 6 | Sumitomo Chemical | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 7 | BASF | Direct competitor | 70% |
| 8 | Innovative Water Care | 70% | |
| 9 | Evonik | 70% | |
| 10 | dsm-firmenich | 69% |
Similarity of trademark activity since 2015 (classes and words used in marks). Retailers appear where their own brands compete on the shelf.
Arysta LifeScience – relevant export countries
South Africa exported US$2.1 billion of the goods Arysta LifeScience's main classes cover in the last year – fumigants; each; biological (class 5); chemicals; agriculture; horticulture; fertilizers (class 1); computer software; computers; electronic publications; apparatus and instruments (class 9); lighting fixtures; electric lamps; ceiling lights (class 11). Combining where these goods are exported, imported, growing and made (and copied), and what protection costs, these are the markets where Arysta LifeScience's trademarks matter most.
Where South Africa exports Arysta LifeScience's top goods
Arysta LifeScience's trademarks most often cover chemicals, fumigants, lighting fixtures and agriculture. South Africa's ten largest export markets for these goods took 64% of its exports of them in 2024.
South Africa's exports of each good to the country in 2024 (US$ million). The goods are the ones Arysta LifeScience's specifications mention most in its main classes; the figures are national exports, not the company's own sales.
Adjust the weightings
These weightings decide how the countries below are ranked. Change any value and the others adjust to keep the total at 100%.
Worldwide
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 4 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | European Union | 77 | US$242 m | -1% | National | US$2,123 |
| 2 | United States of America | 74 | US$131 m | +4% | National | US$2,750 |
| 3 | United Kingdom | 67 | US$31 m | -5% | National | US$1,192 |
| 4 | Japan | 62 | US$5.2 m | -7% | National | US$1,481 |
| 5 | Namibia | 62 | US$214 m | +28% | ARIPO | US$397 |
| 6 | Zimbabwe | 61 | US$214 m | +26% | ARIPO | US$397 |
| 7 | Canada | 61 | US$10 m | -6% | National | US$1,907 |
| 8 | Türkiye | 61 | US$15 m | +0% | National | US$1,119 |
| 9 | Australia | 60 | US$37 m | -8% | National | US$2,020 |
| 10 | India | 59 | US$9.7 m | -11% | National | US$1,051 |
Africa
| # | Market | Score | SA exports | Import growth / yr | Route | Cost, 4 classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Namibia | 62 | US$214 m | +28% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
| 2 | Zimbabwe | 61 | US$214 m | +26% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
| 3 | Zambia | 58 | US$359 m | +1% | National | US$2,110 |
| 4 | Nigeria | 56 | US$23 m | -21% | National | US$812 S&Z |
| 5 | Botswana | 55 | US$181 m | -14% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
| 6 | Malawi | 55 | US$18 m | +38% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
| 7 | Algeria | 53 | US$1.0 m | +17% | National | US$1,302 |
| 8 | Eswatini | 53 | US$76 m | -15% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
| 9 | OAPI (17 states) | 52 | US$22 m | -0% | National | US$1,378 S&Z |
| 10 | Mozambique | 52 | US$79 m | -22% | ARIPO | US$397 S&Z |
SA exports = South Africa's exports of these goods to the market in the last year. Ranked with the default weightings. Score 0–100 from South Africa's exports of the goods to the market, net imports, import growth, foreign trademark filings, where the goods are made, market size and the cost of protection. Costs are total fees (official and professional) to file in 4 classes; ARIPO costs are per country, plus US$290 once per ARIPO application; S&Z = S&Z's own all-in price. Goods are taken from the classes and specifications, so the ranking is indicative.
Trade data: CEPII BACI (version 202601, trade flows 2022–2024), Licence Etalab 2.0; aggregated and combined with other data by S&Z.
Protecting its top brands in Nigeria and OAPI with S&Z
| Brand | Classes | Nigeria | OAPI (17 states) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CROPVISION | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| IVM | 4 | US$812 | US$1,378 |
| GALELA KAKUHLE | 3 | US$609 | US$1,194 |
| ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE | 2 | US$406 | US$1,009 |
| ARYSTA | 2 | US$406 | US$1,009 |
S&Z all-in prices per brand in its number of classes, filing to registration.
TM Country Selection Rank the countries for your own goods and get the quotes.
Word marks you may have considered opposing
For Arysta LifeScience's five most-filed brands: word marks of other companies (not Arysta LifeScience's own group) that our similar word mark search, SimTM, found in the brand's own classes, and that we consider confusingly similar – from the earliest match found to today.
Similar to CROPVISION (classes 5, 9, 42, 44; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to IVM (classes 1, 5, 35, 44; searched 2018-05-30 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to GALELA KAKUHLE (classes 1, 5, 41; no close matches in the search)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found.
Similar to ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE (classes 1, 5; searched 2018-03-28 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similar to ARYSTA (classes 1, 5; searched 2018-03-28 to 2026-11-08)
No confusingly similar marks of other companies found in this period.
Similarity of the words only. Whether a mark could have been opposed depends on the goods and services, the reputation of the brand and the facts – S&Z can advise. New marks like these are what SimTM watch reports as they are published.
How S&Z can help you
S&Z does not just file trademarks. We are a technology-first firm that manages trademarks – analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected.
We manage your trademarks – not just file them
Analysing your data, monitoring competitors and making sure your trademark assets remain protected:
Filing and renewal at fixed, all-inclusive prices
S&Z prices – South African trademarks
| Filing, first class – incl. official fee, examination report, routine office action, acceptance, publication, registration and e-certificate | US$240 |
| Each additional class of the same mark, filed at the same time | US$225 |
| Renewal online, per class (every 10 years from filing) | R1,027 ≈ US$62.29 |
Renewal in rand; US$ at R16.49 per US$.
Arysta LifeScience's next five years of renewals
132 of Arysta LifeScience's registered marks reach their ten-year renewal date in 2027–2031. Renewed online with S&Z, that costs about US$8,223 over the five years.
Arysta LifeScience: frequently asked questions
What should Arysta LifeScience consider for its trademarks?
- Where to file next: its goods sell strongly in Namibia, Zimbabwe and Nigeria – markets where South African exports of the same goods are large or growing, and where S&Z files at its own all-in prices (see “Arysta LifeScience – relevant export countries”).
- Possible gaps: its competitors also protect class 31 (fresh produce & pet food), class 40 (processing materials) – worth checking against what the business sells or plans to sell.
- Brand coverage: Arysta Lifescience, Arysta are protected in only one or two classes – check whether related goods or services (for example merchandise or online services) need cover too.
- Fewer new brands: new brand names fell from 5.4 to 1.0 a year – worth reviewing whether planned launches are being protected early enough.
- Renewals and use: keep track of the ten-year renewal dates and of marks that are no longer used – unused marks can be challenged after five years, and some may no longer be worth renewing.